Posted on May 13th, 2017 by | 6 Replies

Perhaps you’ve done it yourself: ragequitting an MMO. After all, falling in love with an online game is something that happens to many of us. As you spend many hours in the MMO of your choice and the years progress, things will inevitably change, and not always in a direction you like. Where did the magic go? You may have written several threads with your concerns on the official forum. You may have included suggestions that would fix the game for you, but it all falls on deaf ears.

The changes you dread so much are still happening and suddenly you realise that logging in makes you feel frustrated rather than happy. This may be the time to “hit them where it hurts”, unsub and logout of the game for the last time. You write a final angry note on the forum and never look back. But did your actions indeed have any effect on the direction of your MMO? This is the question I want to tackle in this article.

A ‘success story’: Star Wars: the Old Republic (SWTOR)

The direct inspiration for this topic is a recent case in Star Wars: the Old Republic (SWTOR). Ragequitting players seem to have played a vital role in the 180 degree change of course in its reward system this spring. Although SWTOR’s last two expansions have been somewhat of a unique case, focusing on cinematic storytelling exclusively, the game as a whole is an MMO with a traditional setup: a core game with leveling content and expansions that raise the level cap and add new endgame group content.

Historically, SWTOR has been surprisingly gear and alt friendly compared to some of the other titles out there. In the past, I’ve recommended the MMO to friends that were looking for a new raiding experience, because it was quick to get to level cap and easy to gear up with the help of knowledgeable guild members. This all was about to change with the introduction of a game changing feature: SWTOR’s Galactic Command system.

In the autumn of 2016, SWTOR rolled out this system as part of their expansion Knights of the Eternal Throne (KOTET). Players were wary and critical from the start. Galactic Command introduced three tiers of gear, divided over 300 ranks, available to level capped (70) players with an active subscription only. Participating in activities would grant command experience (CXP) that would allow players to increase in rank. Each rank, a command crate was earned that had a low chance to drop a piece of random gear. Traditional sources of gear, such as raid bosses, did no longer drop any.

Lightsaber fight in SWTOR

Bioware’s argument for Galactic Command was that it would streamline the gearing process and would allow players that do not participate in group content to gain gear. However, the SWTOR community recognised the system as an enormous gear treadmill that was more frustrating than fun because of the random nature of its rewards. The outcry was enormous, and several things happened at once.

First off, the new reward system seemed to radically steer player behaviour in the game. Rather than participate in traditional content such as flashpoints (small group content) and operations (raids), players resorted to slaughtering great numbers of gold star mobs because they awarded more CXP per minute. Players were constantly looking for the fastest way to gain CXP and the developers could only wait for a new way to game the system to pop up before plugging the leaks, much like a futile game of whack-a-mole.

Secondly, the introduction of a huge gear treadmill in an otherwise respected MMO did not go unnoticed in the MMO scape. Massively OP awarded SWTOR with the not too prestigious “worst business model of 2016” title. Galactic Command completely overshadowed the main content of the expansion: the cinematic conclusion of the story that had started with the previous expansion in 2015. And finally, there were the rage quitters: great masses of players, some loyal fans from the first hour, emptied their hearts on the forum and ended their subscriptions.

The trouble with numbers

I want to briefly pause my account to acknowledge the thing that makes judging these cases tricky. I write “masses of players”, but a problematic factor is that we generally don’t know how many exactly, as that’s information game designers are not willing to make public. Obviously, numbers do matter. If one player ragequits, it won’t have much effect at all. It is something that happens every day. But if many players leave the game at the same time, it sends a message.

In the case of SWTOR, I can only go by my gut feeling and what I hear from other players around me. My impression is that never before in the history of SWTOR have so many people unsubbed at once, except for in the months after its launch in 2012. Most people would know at least one player personally that quit because of galactic command. Also interesting is that people would quit all over the casual-hardcore spectrum, so it wasn’t just one specific type of player that threw in the towel. Galactic Command was universally disliked.

So what happened then? Over the course of half a year, SWTOR’s developers made small tweaks and changes to Galactic Command that made gear more accessible. For most people that quit, this wasn’t enough, as it didn’t change anything to the core system of getting gear at level cap: through RNG only. In February 2017, a particularly out of touch tweet enthusiastically announced 100 more command ranks to grind. The announcement invoked a second huge outrage among SWTOR players.

In the end of that same week, far reaching changes were announced to gearing that effectively rolled back time. Gear would drop from raid bosses again; the last boss would even drop two. Raid gear was buffed to drop a higher tier and would always be ‘gold’ (the rare version that could drop from command crates). On top of this, Galactic Command still rewarded players with crates that were buffed to drop more useful gear more frequently. Overall, gearing in SWTOR has never been as easy as of today.

I’ve put forward SWTOR here as an example of ‘ragequitting done right’: although grudgingly so, its developers eventually listened to its players. Many MMOs have experienced similarly defining moments in their life, moments in which its developers endeavoured to reinvent the wheel. The more I look for examples of successful ‘ragequitting campaigns’ by players, though, the more I find the opposite: MMOs that changed anyway, and suffered the consequences.

When developers don’t listen: Lord of the Rings Online

One such MMO is Lord of the Rings Online (LOTRO). LOTRO celebrates its tenth anniversary this year and has experienced several defining moments throughout its lifespan: from its launch in 2007 and its re-release as a free-to-play game in 2010, to its far reaching class changes with the Helm’s Deep expansion in 2013. Both 2010 and 2013 turned out to be defining moments in the MMO’s player base.

The implementation of free-to-play LOTRO in 2010 made some old time players leave, but as it also brought a steady influx of new players to the game, so it is not surprising that this ragequit wave did not have much of an effect. In a way, the free-to-play system was also a reaction to ragequitters (although not quite the response leaving players had in mind): before its implementation, people had already begun unsubbing due to being disappointed with its previous expansion, Siege of Mirkwood.

Warsteed in LOTRO

Helm’s Deep was a different story, though. The 2013 expansion featured radical changes to long-established class mechanics. First off, skill trees were introduced, and designed in a way that heavily discouraged many classes’ formerly ubiquitous hybrid builds. Secondly, all nine classes were completely revamped, ‘dumbed down’, if you will. Tons of skills were removed in order to make the game more accessible to new players. As a result, many felt like completely different classes: a huge turnoff for old time players who had grown to love their class over the course of six years. Add the initial bugs and clunky combat and it will be no surprise many of these players ragequit.

In contrast to SWTOR’s Galactic Command uproar, however, this player reaction was completely ignored by the developers, who stood by their changes. Although no official subscriber numbers have been released, it does look like ragequitters have had a lasting effect on the health of the MMO: after 2013, no new expansions were released; instead, game development has focused on smaller landscape and quest updates and in 2015, the number of available game servers was reduced from 29 to 10. Although the MMO still holds a nostalgic spot in the hearts of many old time players, LOTRO is no longer regarded as the triple-A MMO it once was. Nowadays, it is mostly played by casual free-to-players and endgame revolves around a shallow grind for essence gear.

The ultimate sob story: Star Wars Galaxies

But if you think LOTRO’s story is sad, then I present to you: Star Wars Galaxies (SWG). Released in 2003, SWG initially launched with a lot of bugs, but nevertheless managed to attract a respectable (for its time) estimate of 300,000 subscribers. But then World of Warcraft (WoW) released in 2004 and dwarfed that number.

Behind the scenes, SWG’s developers worked on a completely revamped version of the game that would effectively simplify the MMO by reducing the amount of available classes from 34 to 9 and replace its turn based combat with fast paced action. These changes, referred to as New Game Enhancements, were meant to attract a different, larger player base; one more like WoW, one could say. But it completely disregarded its core population of gamers that enjoyed SWG’s original skill progression and complicated character builds. What didn’t help was that these far reaching changes were announced a mere two weeks before release, and were initially riddled with bugs.

The New Game Enhancements produced an unparalleled outcry among the player base. Many players experienced the updates as something that changed their characters’ identity and their surrounding virtual world to its core. The commotion over an online game even reached the ears of traditional offline media and, over time, became an example of how not to redesign MMOs.

A shot from Star Wars Galaxies

Letters by ragequitting SWG players addressed to George Lucas give a unique insight into how a change in game design emotionally affected players. “Ragequitting” might not even be the appropriate word: someone working in the health-care industry recognized the emotions displayed by SWG players as “death-in-the-family-type grieving”.

The New Game Enhancements did not bring the influx of players the game developers had hoped. In retrospect, this was often attributed to its loss of flavour: what made it so successful initially was its uniqueness in the MMO-scape. Instead, SWG silently sunk into oblivion, until officially closed in 2012 to make space for SWTOR.

It makes one wonder what would’ve happened to SWTOR if it would’ve clung to its Galactic Command system as originally implemented. Did, in a twisted turn of events, SWTOR only succeed because it learned from its predecessor’s mistakes?

Conclusion: ragequitting as a strategy to steer MMO game design

I obviously haven’t been able to revisit every case of players ragequitting all MMOs out there. However, from what we’ve seen, historical cases do not exactly give off positive vibes for ragequitting as a viable strategy to influence MMO game design. When game developers want to implement far reaching changes that affect the core experience of the MMO, they generally seem stand by their decisions. Whether they listen to the playerbase seems rather arbitrary from a gamer’s perspective.

Cases that had real impact always included players of all types (casual – endgame) being outraged over a change. If only one type of player dislikes a change, developers seem eager to dismiss this type of player and cater to an audience that does like, or is indifferent to, the new style instead. Naturally, ragequitting only has an effect when done in great numbers at a time. Finally, it also matters whether developers have learned from historical examples, such as SWG.

This does not mean that it’s a bad idea to ragequit a game, per se. When an MMO affects you negatively to a point beyond repair, it may be healthiest for you, as a person, to let go. If you are very attached to this hypothetical MMO, you may have to suffer through various stages of grief, but eventually you can find peace in that things are as they are. We have seen that forming social connections and memories in a virtual world can create a strong attachment that is not unlike the loss of a friend or family member when taken away. In this respect, it is not surprising that ragequitting players often leave an angry note behind when unsubbing: anger is one of the emotions in the stages of grief and it is considered a healthy thing to express it rather than bottle it up.

So does ragequitting an MMO work? It is effective for the person who does it, on an individual level, to deal with the emotions that come out when experiencing loss. Whether it will influence the course of the game’s design, however, remains to be seen.


6 thoughts on “Ragequitting an MMO: Does it Work?

  1. Dave

    When I quit an MMO I’m not going back. I left after the new SWTOR and even if they’ve fixed it all, I’m not going back.

    Reply
    1. Ravanel Bro Post author

      As rage quitting is such an emotional thing, I suspect you’re not alone in that. Which on its own would be a reasons for game developers to focus on who’s still there rather than who’s gone.

      Reply
  2. Shintar

    Haha Rav, I had no idea you were a bro now! Fun fact, I first read this article without noticing the author’s name and thought: “Huh, that SWTOR screenshot looks like Rav. Did they nab one from her blog without giving proper credit?”

    That said, I have to admit I don’t think this is a good subject to try to come to conclusions about as a player, because we just don’t have the data, and as the saying goes “anecdotes are not data”. Ghostcrawler (a former WoW dev) actually wrote a blog post about this a few months ago, and said that from a dev point of view, rage-quitting over a specific game change usually has no effect and doesn’t send a message.

    Reply
    1. Ravanel Bro Post author

      Haha, cool that you recognized the screenshot right away! I changed to the Shae cut, so you might be put off in the future. 🙂

      I’m the first to admit that it’s tough to say something without having raw data (and game developers are not likely to provide us with that anytime soon). But I do believe that when you gather enough stories, you can get a likely impression. In this case I’ve asked fellow gamers for their experiences in MMOs I don’t play, and while it was possible for them to come up with examples of certain periods of time in which lots of players ragequit, when asked whether that had any effect on the game’s design, the answer was overwhelmingly “nope”.

      In that regard the post by Ghostcrawler doesn’t surprise me at all. (Thanks for linking that! I miss out on cool stuff because of not playing LoL nor WoW, apparently. Corrected that and added it to my feed.) Of note is that they write “Dropping a game because of a specific design change (…) is actually pretty rare.” In the MMOs of this article, there are only one or two cases of ‘ragequit events’ per lifespan per MMO, which is really not that much. And in the case of LOTRO, it was a combination of factors in each event. It’s a good reminder that it is easier to look back in history to tell what happened than understanding what’s going on when you’re right in the middle of it.

      Reply
  3. Tyler Bro

    I was going to mention Ghostcrawler’s comments on the matter, but it seems Shintar has beat me to the punch. But yes, it’s very hard to have any clear data about whether rage-quitting ever makes a difference, and what little information we do have tends to show that everyday player burnout and churn make much more of an impact on a game’s bottom line.

    It’s worth noting again that those of us who blog and post on forums are a tiny minority of the total playerbase of most games, and we generally lean towards higher end and more “hardcore” players, so our perspective is quite skewed. There’s no way of knowing precise numbers, but I’d be willing to bet a significant portion of SW:TOR’s playerbase didn’t even notice the transition to Galactic Command, let alone care.

    Increasingly I feel it is futile to quit a game to try to make a point. You’re really only punishing yourself. However, if you’re no longer enjoying a game because of changes being made, then of course you should move on. But it should be about what you want, not trying to send a message to a developer who cannot possibly separate you from the noise of the crowd.

    Reply
    1. Ravanel Bro Post author

      Good point about the warped perspective. Players that have invested a lot of time in a game are usually more vocal on fora and other community media, and are also more likely to participate in group content. The masses, however, play on a casual basis, don’t interact with other players (much), don’t follow the MMO’s news all that closely and may never see level cap nor endgame.

      On the one hand it means that far reaching changes have less direct effect to the amount of people subscribing (or paying in another way for playing) than it may seem – game developers have more space to manoeuvre than might seem on first glance.

      On the other hand, it means that changes that are actually not perceived as that detrimental by the majority of the player base, can get a lot of undeserved negative PR that harms the reputation of the MMO.

      I found SWTOR’s case of Galactic Command quite interesting, because it did seem to me its dislike was carried over a broader spectrum than usual with these cases. For instance, I had many people telling me on my blog how much they loathed the system that were playing casually and never grouped up – while the system was designed with exactly these people in mind (so they would be able to get good gear, whereas before they could not)! Whatever may have happened, I do feel the decision to reinstate the previous loot system (in addition to GC) and improving the random loot significantly had and will have a big impact on the future direction of the game.

      As for ragequitting, I do agree with you: people should do so for your own peace of mind, not to expect anything to change as a result. It’s interesting that MMO gamers do often say to quit to ‘send off a message’ and such. But I suspect (as I wrote) that has more to do with needing an outlet for emotions, and something to negate the feeling of being powerless, than realistic expectations.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *